I cannot think of a darker story than that of the treatment of the Jews under the jurisdiction in throughout duration of the third Reich. Knowing the result, organized and systematic genocide on an unprecedented level, it doesn’t seem possible to draw a logical progression to the final result from the general European anti-Semitism. Robert Gellately, in an engaging article, poses a convincing argument in which he illustrates a Nazi Germany in which the mass of the population made possible the enforcement of anti-Jewish legislation that eventually metastasized into the holocaust.
The forced mass conformity of the third Reich undoubtedly played a role in the development of the holocaust. After the enactment of the Nuremburg Laws, the first wave of the mass loss of rights for the Jewish community, Gellately reports that a German citizen felt that most Germans “go back and forth or have contradictory opinions” about the treatment of the Jews in Germany. This response doesn’t seem to be that unnatural. The Germans, while living in a society that was no stranger to anti-semitism, were a Christian nation, and, as Gellately points out, many Christian leaders attempted to use their influence to ease the difficulties of the Jewish burden. Unfortunately, this initial humane urge was quickly diminished by the top down surge of hate.
By 1938, 75 to 80 percent of all Jewish businesses operating in 1933 were liquidated, thus stripping Jews en masse of their livelihoods. This was only the beginning as the first mass deportation to a concentration camp occurred in the same year, starting a disastrous trend. As these blatant civil injustices progressed into outright seizure and murder, German citizens seemed to turn their head.
Dr. Goebbels and his ministry of propaganda played a key role in the development of a murderous psyche. Owning all facets of German media, the Nazi propaganda machine effectively convinced the German public that, among other social atrocities, the Jews were solely responsible for the second world War. Gallately states, “Many people in Germany apparently agreed that the Jews started the war, at least if official surveys from that period can be believed.” The vulnerable German public, which anti-Semitic tendencies, had fallen prey to the intended trap of the Nazi leaders.
As the “final solution” was put into practice, Germans were repeatedly informed of the mass deportations of Jewish people. They were not informed of the fate of these persons, and, from all indications, were not concerned. The turning of a populations’ head to genocide, even under the veil of ignorance, is simply not excusable. This theme is implicit throughout Gellately’s argument as he asserts that most of the people giving away information about to the Nazi’s were not politically motivated, but in fact fell victim to more sinister personal reasons. Studies will continue on this subject, but in light of Gellately’s article, and in line with reasons, it seems that to some degree the blood of millions of innocent Jews have has to be dispersed among the general German public.